Capital Punishment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Capital Punishment - Research Paper Example eval times that even sometimes stretched itself in modern times some were boiling the victim to death, the infamous Mongolian breaking back, catherine or breaking wheel, buried in ground while still alive, burning alive, crucifixion, crushing, decapitation, disembowelment, throwing down from a height, impalement and many other forms of capital punishment were practiced to deliver death to the concerned convict (10 Unusual methods of Capital Punishment, n.d.; Botsman, 2005, p.71). It is worth mentioning that type of capital punishment often differed depending upon the type of crime. A lingering death often awaited a serious convict who is subject to a heinous crime; while a less serious convict might be delivered a quick and almost painless death. Death through thousand cuts or slow slicing that was widely practiced in China in medieval period, reveals another ironical fact (Diehl & Donnelly, 2009, p.150). Here the convict was cut slowly keeping his vital organs intact so that he does not die quickly and suffers each moment of the last moment of his life. The relatives of the victim, if socially powerful and had adequate money often bribed the executioner to end the life of the prisoner after a couple of blow mainly on chest, throat or belly (Min, 2005, p. 15). The modern era ironically (the term used here to reflect the fact that whatever be the means the outcome would always be the same for the victim) brought some sophistication in execution, shooting, electric chair, hanging, electrocution, gas chamber poison injection replaced the brutal medieval acts and were considered to be more humane in nature (Volti, 1999). In USA much controversy has taken place regarding the use of electric chair and gas chamber while executing a convict and most of the states are now... A study of this stature is multidisciplinary and multifaceted. Though exploring the legal realms that governs the current system is my primary objective, yet the study carries many inherent potential apart from that which will explore like each buds of a flower as I move on with my research. In true terms the expected outcome of this study holds the potential to keep a balance between personal and professional augmentation. Capital Crime by Juveniles and the legal dilemma that follow suit will certainly be explored in this study. It is expected to be shown that capital punishment has little to do with curbing juvenile capital crime. On personal ground I will be able to know that what actually leads an adolescent to the world of crime from petty one to as large as capital crime. I am sure that this will reveal more than I expect and explore the multifaceted reasons that lie behind the juvenile capital offenders. This study will also introduce me with an unknown world that is riddled w ith chilled penury and perhaps the breeding ground of juvenile capital and other forms of crime. This might help me to have a different outlook towards juvenile criminals and might even compel me to extend my helping hands towards them. One of the major findings of this study might be ‘looks can be deceptive’ and so our society that we live within.

Corporate Group Structure Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

Corporate Group Structure - Essay Example The existence of the limited liability principle further serves as a means whereby such parent companies may be able to legally escape the consequences of their risk taking and where there is additional scope provided for financial manipulation of accounts. The doctrine of limited liability allows a parent company's responsibility to be limited to its own liabilities and thereby increases the scope for risk taking and profit enhancing behavior, which are generally beneficial for the economy. In the wake of the corporate scandals, reforms have been introduced in most countries, with increased focus on corporate governance and accountability. There have also been further proposals to introduce a more comprehensive regime dealing with corporate liability, wherein parent corporations would also be held responsible for tortuous claims arising out of the actions of their subsidiaries. But such reforms have been opposed on the grounds that they would limit corporate flexibility and function as a deterrent to economic growth because they would hinder risk taking behavior. The analysis below examines the pros and cons of reducing the scope of limited liability and corporate flexibility. The limited liability basis of C... In this case, the Court held that a corporation has a separate and distinct legal personality apart from its owners and/or shareholders. Irrespective of the extent to which a shareholder has an interest in the Company, even if such an individual is the director in complete control of the Company's affairs, the acts and liabilities of the Company are held to be separate and not his/her acts or liabilities. The corporate body as an entity is impersonal and individuals may function in different capacities within an organization3, with their financial activities being shielded from the public eye, by virtue of the corporate veil. The corporation as a legal entity propagates itself and individuals associated with it are able to be exempted from liability for the debts of the Company. The limited liability aspect has been deemed beneficial for the improved efficiency of the securities markets.4 . Limited liability has been deemed to promote "innovation, investment and risk taking by the corporation."5 Limited liability is deemed to have a positive effect in terms of providing incentives for investment, diversification of portfolios and for the efficient operation of security markets. Corporate structure and limited liability: The significance of the Salomon case is that it established (a) a corporation as a separate legal entity and (b) the principle that the debts of a corporation are not the debts of its members, officers or directors. This decision establishing the independent legal personality of the corporation in relation to a single company that was rendered in the Salomon v Salomon6 case was extended to groups of companies by the decision rendered in the case of Adams v Cape Industries Plc7. Extension of